Skip to content
UAS Desk
After-hours

DPRO · NasdaqCM

Draganfly

Commercial / public-safety sUAS, some defense marketing

International / watchlistPure-play 70Defense 25Analyst

3.00

-6.5%

Mkt cap $111.6M

Research score

20

Adjust weights in Scoring

Last Q revenue

n.d.

2026-08-24

Q YoY

+49%

Backlog

n.d.

unable

Last print · Yahoo Finance spark (query1)

What it actually does

Canadian small UAS company listed on Nasdaq. Revenue still a few million a quarter.

Watchlist comparable, not a core U.S. name.

UASYesC-UASNoMaritimeNoPartsPartial

U.S.-listed (Nasdaq) drone OEM that fails the 'meaningful U.S. defense' bar for a core slot. Held as an international/watchlist comparable, not a core score leader.

Buy-side thesis

Cash vs. tiny sales can fund a pivot if a real U.S. vehicle appears — that vehicle is not in this set.

Sell-side thesis

No verified U.S. PoR. TTM ~$6M vs. ~$160M equity.

Historical dilution. Capacity claims ≠ orders.

Financial quality

Low revenue quality and visibility.

Earnings review

Q2 2026 printed mid-August; EPS ~−$0.24 in one recap. Use the 6-K, not the recap, for a model.

Why the score / why it can break

Supports

  • Pure-play score 70 — the P&L is actually about drones/C-UAS.
  • U.S.-listed (Nasdaq) drone OEM that fails the 'meaningful U.S. defense' bar for a core slot. Held as an international/watchlist comparable, not a core score leader.
  • U.S.-listed (Nasdaq) drone OEM that fails the 'meaningful U.S. defense' bar for a core slot. Held as an international/watchlist comparable, not a core score leader.

Risks to the score

  • Valuation risk is elevated vs. the rest of the book.
  • Dilution / issuance flags are on.
  • Execution risk is a primary discount.

Scenarios — not a price target

CasePRevenueMarginsDilutionMultipleImpl. cap / px
bear45%Sub-$10M FYdeep lossesmore papern.m.<$80M / <$2
base40%Slow climblossespauseshigh PS~$160M / ~$4
bull15%A named U.S. vehiclestill thinpausesstory multiple>$400M / >$10

Implied prices are arithmetic from stated assumptions. They are not recommendations.